Robt R Pries wrote: >While the IPNI is very useful, one should be aware that it is not infallible. >Some of the entries are based on very old and fragmentary information and it >is not updated to current taxonomy. How often is the IPNI updated? Can you or anyone else suggest an online source for current taxonomy? Does anyone run a "Today in Taxonomy" site? No, I'm not volunteering! Jim McKenney jimmckenney@starpower.net