pronunciation
J.E. Shields (Tue, 27 Jul 2010 06:40:11 PDT)

So it's small wonder that Botanical Latin begins to seem a bit like Ben's
description of English -- it seems to be a language defined by a committee!

Peter Smithers used to say that Botanical Latin is a written language
rather than a spoken language. So we are on our own, it seems.

Jim Shields

At 10:02 PM 7/26/2010 -0700, you wrote:

On Jul 26, 2010, at 9:07 PM, Adam Fikso wrote:

.......
One point that seems to be lost here is that Botanical Latin is a
separate, somewhat artificially created language composed mainly of
Latin and Greek with snatches of many other languages. The syntax is
mainly dictated by classical Latin, but the vocabulary has been built
gradually over almost three centuries since Linnaeus and codified by
nomenclatural committees of the International Botanical Congresses.
It is not classical Latin. Even if you choose to pronounce most of
it according to the Revised Academic Pronunciation (which is what we
were taught in U.S. high schools and colleges), there are words in
Botanical Latin that are not of Latin origin and thus are pronounced
as in their original languages. .......

John C. MacGregor

*************************************************
Jim Shields USDA Zone 5 Shields Gardens, Ltd.
P.O. Box 92 WWW: http://www.shieldsgardens.com/
Westfield, Indiana 46074, USA
Tel. ++1-317-867-3344 or toll-free 1-866-449-3344 in USA