Name changes in Massonia
Hannon (Sat, 19 Jan 2013 11:05:21 PST)

Lou,

Insights in evolutionary history and mechanisms continue to be
awe-inspiring. But if we reduce it completely, absolutely to time and
materials subjected to random processes, how can anyone justify the value
of a cloud forest or a rare Griffinia? By this philosophy it matters not at
all if the world is populated by a few organisms or millions. The
destruction of nature can be justified by this means.

Dylan

On 19 January 2013 10:18, lou jost <loujost@yahoo.com> wrote:

Dylan Hannon said "On another level, a reductive, materialist view of life
denies any
meaningful natural order. It posits merely random associations of molecules
and environmental factors over time and space. How can this be reconciled
with more traditional views, i.e., an intelligible natural world?"

Dylan, the "more traditional view" you mention was overturned 150 years
ago. Darwin's brilliant achievement was to show that the apparent order and
design really is the result of random factors molded by natural selection
and drift. That was one of the deepest insights in human history. And one
of the most awe-inspiring.
_______________________________________________
pbs mailing list
pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php
http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/