The Wiki is an amazing resource and I use it often. Many Google species searches take me right too the PBS wiki. The quality of information can't be beat. FB can also be a great tool but for different reasons. Some of us are on both but I suspect that the groups served by this mailing list and FB are somewhat different. My guess is that those here are, on average, older and more knowledgeable I suspect that those that contribute to the Wiki are the best of the best of us. FB, on average, serves a younger crowd. However, if the mission is to promote bulbs and bulb education, and to facilitate transferring knowledge to following generations, then using "newer" media like Facebook does make a lot of sense. In my area of professional expertise (cephalopods), I work with many levels - from a list serve and database that is mostly PhD's to a moderated on topic only list-serve to a website forum where much anything pg13 goes, on topic or not. What I'm suggesting is that we can have multiple solutions that coexist well. I personally think it would be good for the group with the wiki (and quality information) to reach out using other media. If pbs does take a leadership role, it can actively promote the Wiki as well as reach a somewhat different audience. If not, FB pages on bulbs will probably happen anyway. . . and is happening anyway. . . I'm in 2-3 bulb groups on FB - I'm sure some of you are as well. Your mileage may vary. James -- James B. Wood Ph.D. Webmaster of The Cephalopod Page Co-author: "Octopus - The Ocean's Intelligent Invertebrate" "Entrepreneurship is the pursuit of opportunity without regard to resources currently controlled." Stevenson