Great points, Jim. I agree with Most of what you said. However, perhaps another question PBS should discuss is...... how big of a group do you want PBS to be? Years ago, I was one of the founders of a tiny group now HUGE called the Northwest Perennial Alliance. The size of a large group requires major management, finances, and, sadly, dealing with alot of factions that aren't always so pleasant, along with untold other issues you may not have thought about. I'm not suggesting that PBS be a small, elite group. Far from it. The inclusion of new members from a broad range of backgrounds and experiences could only add balance, interest, and different perspectives, that I think are healthy for a group of this type. Putting the group out there in a MAJOR way will certainly help prop up the numbers etc. Just be ready On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Peter Taggart <petersirises@gmail.com>wrote: > nice question Ina! > Peter (UK) > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Ina <klazina@orcon.net.nz> wrote: > > > So the page is there. But there is no way to do anything except look at > > it and like it. How can it be made to be useful? > > > > Ina > > > > Ina Crossley > > Auckland New Zealand Zone 10 > > > > On 22/01/2013 11:31 a.m., Steve Marak wrote: > > > Neither slings nor arrows here, Jim. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > pbs mailing list > > pbs@lists.ibiblio.org > > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php > > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/ > > > _______________________________________________ > pbs mailing list > pbs@lists.ibiblio.org > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/ >