But it would be nice to have some kind of term to refer to the type of plants where the specific individual plant that produced a flower, even if it has formed a clump, will no longer form any more flowers and is going to die away. I've had to explain this several times to different non-botanical friends who planted bananas and expected the same plant they planted to keep on producing bunches of bananas year after year just like all their "other fruit trees". I tell them that they need to leave some of the "baby plants" or "suckers" that form alongside the main plant, because they'll be the ones to produce fruit in subsequent years, ad infinitum. It's also useful to me when I'm contemplating purchasing a plant I haven't grown before, so that I know to save seeds or leave the offsets to grow so that I can continue to enjoy it after the original plant I planted dies away. Also, clearly it shouldn't be referred to as an annual or biennial because the time from seed to flower and fruit isn't defined by the specific number of seasons it has been growing. Aren't there a few palms and most bamboos that also have this characteristic of dying after they flower and fruit? And according to _Charlotte's Web_, spiders have this characteristic, too. ;-) --Lee Poulsen Pasadena, California, USDA Zone 10a Tony Avent wrote: > Dylan: > > Sorry to have opened the worm can. I agree that monocarpic isn't a > great term for agaves, despite it's origin as Jim well described. Some > agave species act like bromeliads and the rosettes die after > flowering. Species like A. parviflora, striata and other non-suckering > species flower and then offset on the same stem, then start growing > again. Multiannual doesn't fill the niche, since the nature of the word > seems contradictory....multi - annual. > > > -- --Lee Poulsen Pasadena, California, USDA Zone 10a