New Drimiopsis
Tim Harvey (Thu, 15 Sep 2011 10:48:57 PDT)
Yes, D. purpurea is a valid name and a real plant. It is somewhat smaller than ISI 2011-25, and has more hair, particularly on the petioles.
T
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:41:02 -0400
From: wusong@evilemail.com
To: pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [pbs] New Drimiopsis
That's the one.
I wasn't sure if *D. purpurea* was even a valid name. I've only seen it ("*D.
purpurea*")on some Japanese plant blogs, and the ones I saw were definitely
the same plant as the one I rec'd, and the locality given was the same.
Thanks and best regards,
Dave
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Tim Harvey <zigur@hotmail.com> wrote:
Do you mean the plant currently offered by ISI??
http://huntington.org/BotanicalDiv/ISI2011/…
It is not 'aka' D. purpurea, which is a different plant.
T
_______________________________________________
pbs mailing list
pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php
http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/
_______________________________________________
pbs mailing list
pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php
http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/