OT [was :Feeding bulbs (was Lachenalia)]
Rand Nicholson (Thu, 07 Apr 2005 05:24:22 PDT)
All:
My apologies to the PBS List and Lauw de Jager for the double post saying the same thing, phrased differently.
Obviously, there are people in this world who should *finish* drinking their morning coffee before attempting anything as complex as written communication and/or pushing a button. I am chagrined to find that I am one of them.
Kind Regards,
RandRand
On His SecondSecond Cup Of Coffee In Some Misty Canadian Time Zone By-The-Sea
Dear Lauw:
How does this work with a bulb that has produced a flush of leaves and is sending up a bloom stalk? What I draw from the responses concerning my mystery Lachenalia is that the bulb needs little or no feeding, aside from a yearly repotting.
Rand
Dear Alberto,
I always read your comments with much intererest.
But I feel that this statement needs qualifying a bit more, as it is a very
interesting aspect when it concerns "bulbs".
Plants only use minerals when there is chlorophytic activity.
As for applying nutrients at the beginning of the cycle: the plants will
not use them, as long as they have no leaves. The plant uses its reserves to
create its structure. When the reserves become low, the plant should have
sufficient leaves to enable rebuilding its reserves by absorbing minerals.
When flowering takes place at the end of the cycle, leaves tend to
disintegrate and assimilation of minerals stops. In that case there is
little point of feeding the plant.
I look forward to hear, what the plant physiologists amongst will think.
Kind regards
--
Rand Nicholson
Zone 5b Eastern Maritime Canada
_______________________________________________
pbs mailing list
pbs@lists.ibiblio.org
http://www.pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php