If you go to the Worsleya group website <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Worsleya_procera/> and click on Photos, there are a number of different clones shown there. There is quite some variation in the shades of color as well as form of the various clones. Since mine are the only ones I've seen in real life, and the photos I uploaded are fairly accurate (the color is quite similar to the color of Griffinia; however, the Griffinia color is much smoother and concentrated IMO), I can't say how they compare colorwise to anyone else's. I know that the Worsleya list owner who has seen several different clones in flower thinks that the clone that is grown in New Zealand is one of the prettiest (Bill Dijk, Tony Palmer, and Terry Hatch grow it), whereas what he calls the Cosh clone is one of the least pretty but is the most prolific off-setter of baby bulbs, so it is much more common (at least in Australia). So I wouldn't be surprised if Bill's are bluer than mine. --Lee Poulsen Pasadena area, California, USDA Zone 9-10 On Sep 17, 2004, at 2:19 PM, piaba wrote: > i meant to ask about the color of the flowers. bill > dijk's photo shows a much bluer flower than lee > poulsen's. i assume this plant has flowers that are > more purple-lavender than blue-lavender? > > ===== > tsuh yang