Although sometimes it may seem like a bother, it’s good to remember
that these phytosanitary rules are in place for a very important reason.
Non-native invasive pests, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, algae,
plants, and animals have serious consequences when introduced into new
areas. Lots and lots of examples of this.

Although a fine from USDA would be unpleasant, it would be worse to be
responsible for introducing a new pest like the Narcissus bulb fly.

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2024 23:41:37 -0700
From: <michaelcmace@gmail.com>
To: <pbs@lists.pacificbulbsociety.net>
Subject: Re: [pbs] Phytos for bulb imports into the US
Message-ID: <02ae01dae7cb$b0814490$1183cdb0$@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Bern wrote:

the resources and will to do so, they could easily determine if you
have a USDA permit. It's a worst case scenario, but I wouldn't take that chance.

Not to mention, everything we write on this mail list, including our
names, is archived online where the USDA or other authorities could
easily read it.
And in the past we've had USDA officials who were members of the list.
So really if you plan to break the rules, it's not a good idea to brag
about it here.

Personally, I think it's easier in the long run to just cooperate with
the rules. Not only do you remove the risk, if we cooperate with the
USDA we have a better chance of getting their help when we need
adjustments in the rules.

Case in point, there is a little-known permit that gives you a way to
import bulbs into the US without a phyto when you really can't get
one. It's called a Controlled Import Permit, form 588. I haven't used
it, but we've been told by USDA personnel in the past that it's an
option for us.

Mike
San Jose, CA