Sorry folks, They are definitely M. gigandra. The pot ID tag was badly smeared so I have gone back & checked the invoice which clearly shows them to be Moraea gigandra. Karl On Jun 11, 2014 11:05 AM, "ds429" <ds429@frontier.com> wrote: > Thanks Mary Sue for pointing this out. It appears that Telos only sells > Moraea gigandra, so, presumably, that's what it is. > > Dell > -------------------------------------------- > On Wed, 6/11/14, Mary Sue Ittner <msittner@mcn.org> wrote: > > Subject: [pbs] Latest BX > To: pbs@lists.ibiblio.org > Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2014, 9:51 AM > > Regarding this entry: > From Karl Church: > 6. Moraea gigantea, OP, ex Telos > > Should it be Moraea gigandra? The Plant List says Moraea > gigantea > Klatt is a synonym of Moraea miniata Andrews and if that is > what this > is, that species is very invasive and not supposed to be > sent from > state to state in the USA and probably shouldn't be listed > in a BX at > all. But if it is M. gigandra, that is a very beautiful > species with > in my experience very short blooming season. > > Mary Sue > > _______________________________________________ > pbs mailing list > pbs@lists.ibiblio.org > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/ > > _______________________________________________ > pbs mailing list > pbs@lists.ibiblio.org > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/list.php > http://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/ >