My ignorant self just HAS to say something about this. If a person pays full postage to receive a product from anywhere, they are entitled to receive that product as promised. However necessary the government's interception of the product may be does not negate this fact. Our tax dollars already pay for each and every one of those Federal employees to do whatever job they do, and that should include whatever additional costs are incurred by their additional requirements related to that package. Now, since that green label is not the recipient's address, therein may lie the reason for the Postal Service's complaint. Personally, I think the Postal Service should not be complaining about it. They forward mail for free when a person moves. They return mail for free, when an address is undeliverable, ETC. Since my reasoning could be very flawed, and what the government or postal service takes from us is not already way more than necessary, it does seem that the inspection offices could easily manage an inventory of C.O.D. labels. Laura & Dave wrote: > I may be behind the times, but what ever happened to C.O.D. postal > service? Mr. Kelly M. Irvin 10850 Hodge Ln Gravette, AR 72736 USA 479-787-9958 USDA Cold Hardiness Zone 6a/b mailto:kelly@irvincentral.com http://www.irvincentral.com/ >