Scilla
Jane McGary (Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:39:44 PST)

Julian Slade has presented a synopsis of a new view of the genus Scilla,
some of which is unsurprising and some of which is bound to induce
splitting headaches. Julian, would you please provide us with the
literature citations for this information? Or if not published, Internet
citations or at least the names of those proposing the new classification.

One would hope that the new groups of genera proposed might eventually
settle out as genera, despite the reasons Julian mentions against this, and
the new genera themselves as subgenera or sections. My mind is willing to
entertain Scilla, Section Schnarfia, but not Schnarfia messeniaca.

With best wishes for the season,
Jane McGary

At 06:54 PM 12/17/2003 +1030, you wrote:

Recent scientific studies using DNA sequencing technology have shown that
what we know as Scilla actually appear to have multiple evolutionary
origins. Therefore it seemed reasonable to recognise each coherent group as
separate genera. The following lists these new or resurrected genera that
have been proposed.

Firstly, Scilla lazulina from Zimbabwe appears to be the most primitive
'Scilla'. Was put into Merwilla (see below) before DNA sequencing showed
otherwise. No genus name has yet been proposed.

Pseudoprospero: only 1 species, P. firmifolium. Instantly recognisable in
frequently having a side branch on the flower scape. Summer-growing.
Apparently the second-most primitive of the 'Scillas'.

The remaining 'Scillas' belong to 2 geographical groups: sub-Saharan
African/Indian (which also includes Lachenalia, Ledebouria, Massonia,
Daubenya, Drimiopsis, etc.) and North African/European/Asian (also including
Hyacinthus, Bellevalia, Hyacinthella, Muscari, etc.).

...

The differences between these genera may seem minor, but the only thing they
all have in common is the bluish, star-shaped flowers (which appears to be a
primitive characteristic). Any attempt to reduce the number of genera (by
coalescing related ones) would cause the disappearance of many
well-established ones, as well as making these new super-genera difficult if
not impossible to define.

Definitely controversial!

Julian Slade