Many thanks! On Mon, Nov 9, 2020, 1:31 PM Mary Sue Ittner via pbs < pbs@lists.pacificbulbsociety.net> wrote: > The Albuca wiki page describes some of the taxonomic changes: > > https://pacificbulbsociety.org/pbswiki/index.php/… > > Here's what Kew considers to be the accepted species of Albuca: > > > http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/… > > and Ornithogalum: > > > http://plantsoftheworldonline.org/taxon/… > > Whether everyone agrees with this is another matter. > > Mary Sue > > > I know not too long ago, Manning and Goldblatt bumped a ton of > Ornithogalum > > and other genera into Albuca, and not long after that, a molecular study > > basically said "hol' UP," supporting maintaining separate genera. > > > > Is there a current (accepted) list of what went back to Ornithogalum and > > what didn't? > > > _______________________________________________ > pbs mailing list > pbs@lists.pacificbulbsociety.net > http://lists.pacificbulbsociety.net/cgi-bin/… > Unsubscribe: <mailto:pbs-unsubscribe@lists.pacificbulbsociety.net> > _______________________________________________ pbs mailing list pbs@lists.pacificbulbsociety.net http://lists.pacificbulbsociety.net/cgi-bin/… Unsubscribe: <mailto:pbs-unsubscribe@lists.pacificbulbsociety.net>