On 1/6/2016 1:03 PM, Robin Graham Bell wrote: > Finally, while you may not personally benefit from the discovery of a new species, people do benefit from these discoveries, taxonomists get tenure, publishers get books, nurserymen get plants, often expensive ones, people underwrite discovery expeditions & gardeners want to have them & other people become experts. One might add that when a plant with very limited distribution is described as a taxon (specfies or subspecies), laws in some countries encourage the protection of its habitat from human activities that might threaten the organism's survival. This effect, entirely beneficial in the view of most of us, in turn may protect the taxonomic classification of the organism even after DNA analysis, e.g., has determined that it is a hybrid (Fritillaria gentneri), a somewhat non-viable polyploid (the "dinosaur daisy" of Colorado), or merely a slightly different color form of a more common taxon (all those newly named crocuses in Turkey, which are probably being eaten up by sheep anyway). This effect is sometimes annoying to academic botanists. In the USA, state Native Plant Societies are particularly protective of local forms, and of small local populations of plants that are common in other states. I imagine the same kind of situation obtains in Britain. Jane McGary Portland, Oregon, USA