Even if these numbers were correct, what is the point of reporting the Google results? Nathan At 10:04 PM 10/12/2014, you wrote: >Good spot Ken. I was using the spelling in the subject heading in >the previous post which I think originally came from you and was >repeated by a number of others and it was wrong and I didn't catch >it and then I repeated it. And it will remain forever misspelled in >our archives. And yes it is very easy to do and probably why there >are a lot of plant names on the Internet spelled more than one way. >Scilla madeiriensis 76,800 Google hits >Scilla maderensis 19,200 Google hits >Scilla maderiensis 308 Google hits with a number of them from the pbs list. > >Mary Sue