As usual this time of year, I'm wondering what to call the many seed-grown Narcissus in my bulb beds. Browsing through the PBS wiki sections on Narcissus led me to a discussion of classification by Brian Mathew in the book "Narcissus and Daffodil," a collective volume edited by Gordon R. Hanks and available through CRC. Whoever wrote the introductory sections on our wiki apparently had access to this chapter, but when I went looking for it, I found I could download the book (most of which concerns the chemistry, especially pharmacological, of Narcissus) for the princely sum of $117, or have access to the chapter for 72 hours for only $20. I decided against the whole book, but am wondering whether it makes sense to get access for a short period to something I can't download separately and keep for later reference. I suspect I couldn't print it off the screen, either. Do any of our correspondents have an opinion on this? Will it help me with Section Jonquilla, the major source of my frustration? I have John Blanchard's book "Narcissus: A guide to wild daffodils," which we discussed a week or two ago, but in many cases it serves mostly to assure the reader that he or she is not alone in being confused about these plants. It also describes well-known natural sites for many species, which helped, e.g., in examining two collections of N. bulbocodium from Oukaimedin, Morocco--I think I got ssp. bulbocodium in one case, and the intermediate with ssp. nivalis in the other. I am tempted to call most of them hybrids anyway, though I did raise quite a few from wild-collected seeds. In any case, they are bright, vigorous, and fragrant, and most of them probably can move to the garden successfully, as long as the bulb fly lets them. Jane McGary Portland, Oregon, USA