I use Dogpile most frequently. One has to winnow the chaff,by accessing as many sources as possible. I've found bs in university papers,as well as other places online. I'm not familiar with that scientific search engine. I used to look at the list for new ones,but life gets in the way and I am only one person. Thank you. I'll check it out. Del --- On Wed, 6/16/10, Adam Fikso <adam14113@ameritech.net> wrote:
From: Adam Fikso <adam14113@ameritech.net>
Subject: Re: [pbs] Was Hybrids Species now Cleistogamy.
To: "Pacific Bulb Society" <pbs@lists.ibiblio.org>
Date: Wednesday, June 16, 2010, 8:41 PM
Del--you're right. I hadn't thought it out. I use Dogpile (used by many
research librarians). Less garbage. And in my self-centerednessdidn't
think about other people's search techniques, nor Google, which I despise,
because of what you say. And some of that comes up on Dogpile because it
includes Google. A friend uses Scirus which is for science only and don't
know how it would serve here. I'll have to recheck it. It is
science-specific and might be the answer.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Del Allegood" <npublici@yahoo.com>
To: "Pacific Bulb Society" <pbs@lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 3:15 PM
Subject: Re: [pbs] Was Hybrids Species now Cleistogamy.
A small part of the problem is that most people "Google" before they ask
questions,quite often. Unfortunately, Google does not have all the
answers,nor does it always have the best answers. There are many other
search engines. Google has,more than ever,been giving the information which
pays the most