>Has anyone else followed many of the photo links on World Checklist pages? >At present, they're set up to do a Google search of images under whichever >name you've clicked, with the thoroughly bizarre result that all sorts of >erroneous photos appear. Dear All; Has no one noticed that anyone can post anything to the WWW and that truth and reality sometimes have no relationship to the information found there? "Expertise" is very relative. Whether it is picture or text, opinion or just plain crazy, somehow all get equal billing. I am not meaning to chastise Google as it is true of everything you see on the web. The reader must always keep a high degree of skepticism available. After all any sane person might give more credulity to garden information in a vetted botanical garden's authorized publication, than to Joe Smith's garden site. But hundred's of people send money to share in some Nigerian king's wealth or reply to a lottery they never entered. I suspect that RBG Kew may add a word of warning if enough people comment directly to the authors of this site. I doubt they mean to lead anyone astray. Caveat Emptor still holds true regardless of the 'cost' of the information. Best Jim W. -- Dr. James W. Waddick 8871 NW Brostrom Rd. Kansas City Missouri 64152-2711 USA Ph. 816-746-1949 Zone 5 Record low -23F Summer 100F +