Ina, The foliage is reminiscent of Brunsivia josephine as its leaves aren't prostrate, as for the flowers I would assume it to be a hybrid like Jim suggested! Sadly it does look virused, if you paid for the bulb I would ask for a refund! Josh From: Ina Crossley <klazina1@gmail.com> To: Pacific Bulb Society <pbs@lists.ibiblio.org> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 2:59 PM Subject: Re: [pbs] Which Brunsvigia Thanks for the response. This is not an Hippeastrum, they are dormant now, we are just going into winter. I suspect Jim Lykos has the identification sorted. It is too showy for an Amaryllis and the wrong leaves for a Brunsvigia, even the Brunsvigia Grandiflora. I noticed the marbling of the leaves. I have passed on the messages to the original giver of the bulb. Thank you Ina On 27/05/2011 12:08 a.m., Alberto Castillo wrote: > It is not Brunsvigia radulosa, looks like hippeastrum foliage in your photo. > > The first one, that of the foliage, perhaps can go to the wiki but to the virus page. Those stripes are not normal in Brunsvigia, etc. > >